The Democratic Party and its operatives and toadies in the corporate media continue to lie about election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

There is overwhelming evidence that Trump truly won the election and that the presidency was stolen from him. But the legacy media’s talking heads continue to look everyone in the eye and lie about this with absolutely no shame.

Endless and Relentless Lying

One of the most extraordinary things about how the legacy media has approached the election fraud issue is the absolute uniformity of their coverage on their subject. The lines between supposedly “liberal” networks like MSNBC and allegedly “conservative” ones like Fox have vanished entirely. With scarcely any exceptions, they all say the same thing on the subject.

Not only this, but what’s even more creepy is that they all use the same, or nearly the same, phrases to dismiss election fraud concerns. How often have you heard statements like, “There is no evidence of election fraud,” or “This was the most secure election in American history”? How often have you heard Trump’s claims that the election was stolen from him referred to as “baseless” or “unsubstantiated”?

Whenever media figures are all not only saying the same things but are even using the same words and phrases to say them, that is a sign that they are being fed their talking points from above, and you should be immediately skeptical of everything they say. One of the most effective ways to embed ideas into people’s minds — even false ideas — is through constant repetition.

Another major lie perpetuated by the media has been that all of the election fraud challenges have failed in court. The truth is that the vast majority of them were never even heard in court. Judges did not determine evidence to be lacking or insufficient so much as that they simply ignored the evidence.

In one especially egregious instance of this, one judge in Nevada was presented with 8,000 pages of affidavits and other evidence alleging election fraud in his state. He dismissed the case 24 hours later. Was he able to read all 8,000 of those pages and fairly weigh the plausibility of the claims made within them in so short a space of time? Unlikely. Similar stories are true for judges across the country.

Statistical analyses conducted by the likes of Matt Braynard, Col. Philip Waldron, John Droz Jr., Russell James Ramsland and many others have revealed glaringly and astronomically improbable results in Biden vote totals and patterns. As Droz’s analyst states, “There is very strong evidence that the absentee voting counts were manipulated by a computer algorithm. The comparison of the 2020 results to the normal 2016 election data is dramatic.”

The former White House Trade advisor has reached similar conclusions in a series of three reports in which he summarizes all of the election fraud evidence.

Don’t let the media gaslight you: There was election fraud in 2020.